Legal Opinion

Synek v. McCarthy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 23, 1948No. Civ. 45-726Published

1Opinion of the Court

BONDY, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for an order directing the defendants to produce and to give to plaintiff and his attorneys an inspection of “the process which the defendants have been using and still use in the manufacture of beads” and of “the bead making machine which the defendants have been using and still use.” From the affidavits it is not Cclear whether or not the plaintiff claims that the defendants have been, or are, using only one process and only one machine.

If a party does not have sufficient…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Connecticut Importing Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1940
  2. Marzo v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1945
  3. Schoenberg v. Decorative Cabinet Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API