Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Drake Motor Lines, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1978No. Civ. A. No. 77-1874PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEWCOMER, District Judge.

On September 8, 1977, a default was entered against defendant Drake Motor Lines as it failed to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint filed by the plaintiffs on May 27, 1977. The defendant moved on October 5, 1977, to set aside the default under Rule 60(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As this case has been recently assigned to this Court, the motion is before it, and the Court, upon consideration of the motion, has decided to grant it.

In this labor case, the plaintiffs are suing their employer, Drake Motor Lines, for breaching…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Eli L. Medunic and Dolores M. Medunic v. Louis W. LedererCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,480 John Hassenflu Nad James Howell v. William A. PykeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Thorne v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Arthur Treacher's Franchisee LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Menna v. Murphy (In Re Murphy)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1979
  3. In Re W & L Associates, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Chase v. Contractors' Equipment & Supply Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Olympic Gardens, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API