Legal Opinion

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,923 Nottingham Partners v. Trans-Lux Corporation

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 7, 1991No. 90-1859PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Nottingham Partners and Deerfield Partners, plaintiffs below, invoking federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, brought suit for securities law violations allegedly committed by Trans-Lux Corporation and its directors. After a parade of intervening events, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that the defendants were entitled to summary judgment because the plaintiffs’ claims were extinguished at the time a shareholders’ class action was resolved in the Delaware courts. Sparing little in the way of impassioned rhetoric,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Adams Extract Co., Great Northern Packaging Corp., Cfs Continental, Inc., Rossville Packing Co., Andre-Boudin Bakeries, Inc., Townhouse Furniture, Denver Meat Co., Carron Manufacturing Co., Ilikon Corp., Wittek Golf Supply Co., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees v. Pleasure Hours, Inc., St. Joe Paper Co., the Continental Group, Olinkraft, Inc., Container Corporation of America, the Chesapeake Corporation of Virginia, Owens-Illinois, Inc., MacMillan Bloedel, Inc., Inland Container Corp., Menasha Corp., U. S. Corrugated Fibre-Box Co., Stone Container Corp., Defendants- Appellants-Appellees. In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Adams Extract Co., Cfs Continental, Inc., Townhouse Furniture, Rossville Packing Co., Denver Meat Co., Carron Manufacturing Co., Andre-Boudin Bakeries, Inc., Ilikon Corp., Great Northern Packaging Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees, Pleasure Hours, Inc., London Dry Ltd., Plaintiffs- Objectors-Appellants-Appellees v. The Chesapeake Corporation of Virginia, Stone Container Corp., Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Tbk Partners, Ltd. v. Western Union Corporation, Frances D. Spier, Objectors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Class v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Patrowicz v. Transamerica HomeFirst, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  4. Skilstaf, Inc. v. Cvs Caremark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Davignon v. ClemmeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API