Prime Insurance Company v. Graves
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
TOOMEY, Judge:
T1 In this appeal we must determine whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied Pamela Graves's rule 56(f) motion and whether it erred when it granted Prime Insurance Company's summary judgment motion. We conclude that it did not do either and affirm the court's order. °
{ 2 "When reviewing a summary judgment by the district court, we must examine all of the facts presented and the inferences to be drawn therefrom in: the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co., 2003 UT 8, ¶ 20, 70 P.3d 1. We therefore…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Alf v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas v. MattenaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- Federated Capital Corporation v. DeutschCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018