Legal Opinion
Neumont v. Monroe County
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided February 13, 2004No. 99-10054-CIVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VITUNAC, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Order of Reference (DE 382) from United States District Judge James C. Paine referring the Plaintiffs’ Request for Ruling on Expense Shifting Sanctions (DE 381) “for recommended and/or final disposition.” On June 25, 2003, the Court entered an order (DE 385) denying the motion and deferring ruling on the expense shifting sanctions until the end of the case. On September 3, 2003, Judge Paine entered an order (DE 399) issuing findings of fact and giving the parties ten days to inform this Court “of all…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Loranger v. StierheimCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Maddow v. Procter & Gamble Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Rhein Medical, Inc. v. KoehlerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995