Legal Opinion
Loranger v. Stierheim
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 4, 1994No. 88-5179PublishedCited by 290 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC
2Per curiam
As no member of this panel, nor any other judge in regular active service on this court, has requested that this court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Fed.R.App.P.; 11th Cir.Rule 35-5), the suggestion of rehearing en banc is DENIED. However, the original panel hereby grants rehearing, withdraws the previous panel opinion dated September 28, 1993, published at 3 F.3d 356 (11th Cir.1993), and substitutes therefor the following opinion:
I. BACKGROUND
This appeal arises out of a dispute between William Loranger (“Loranger”) and…
3Cases cited30 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by290 opinions
- Baker v. AldermanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Loranger v. StierheimCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Villano v. City of Boynton BeachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Frazier v. Absolute Collection Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011
- In re UlrichUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
285 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.