Legal Opinion
State v. Wang
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided May 20, 1999No. 21387PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
RAMIL, J.
Defendant-appellant Joo Ho Wang appeals from his conviction of driving without no-fault insurance in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 431:100-104 (1993). 1 Wang contends that he should have been afforded amnesty under HRS § 43L10C-104.5 (Supp.1997). We agree and reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are undisputed. On August 9, 1997, Wang was cited for driving without valid no-fault insurance. On August 19, 1997, Wang obtained valid no-fault insurance. Wang entered a plea of not guilty at arraignment, on September 10, 1997, and the court…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. TauiliiliHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. PutnamHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Hall v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SavitzHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.