Legal Opinion

Wong Nin v. City and County

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1935No. 2198PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

COKE, C. J.

The plaintiff, Wong Nin, on March 11, 1932, instituted in the circuit court of the first judicial circuit his action against the defendant, the City and County of Honolulu, for the recovery of damages caused by the alleged wrongful diversion of water appurtenant to the land of plaintiff located in Manoa Yalley, Honolulu. Later on plaintiff filed an amended declaration to which defendant interposed a demurrer and the judge of the circuit court has reserved for our consideration the single question, to wit: “Should defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s amended…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. . Lincoln Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Prentiss v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Freeman v. Fowler Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Edwards v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Higa v. MirikitaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Woodland v. LyonIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Aana v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
  4. Anderson v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Garner v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API