Legal Opinion

Woodland v. Lyon

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1956No. 8362PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Justice.

This is an action to recover damages for injury to pasture and growing crops of alfalfa hay and grain, for damage which resulted from the obstruction of a watercourse, and for the cost of removing the obstruction.

The parties own adjoining lands on the south fork of Pocatello Creek, respondents’ land being upstream from appellant’s. Appellant claims a decreed water right in the stream of five-tenths of a second foot.

Plaintiff and appellant alleged that respondents filled in the stream bed on their land in October, 1949, so that the water was diverted and did not reach…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boise Development Co. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Walker v. DistlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Say v. HodginIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  4. MacDonald v. OganIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Wagner v. Purity Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Curtis v. FirthIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. O'DELL v. BasabeIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Rosenberg v. ToetlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Clear v. MarvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Coast Transport, Inc. v. StoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API