LuGrain v. State
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
In this consolidated appeal, two prison inmates raise two common issues. First, they challenge the constitutionality of a prison rule. Second, they contend the evidence was not sufficient to support their convictions for allegedly violating this rule. Under the rule a prisoner may be punished for possession of drugs if the inmate fails to provide a urine sample within two hours of a request to do so. Both inmates had allegedly failed to provide such samples and were found guilty of violating the rule. After exhausting their administrative remedies, each inmate filed an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sanford v. ManternachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Giles v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Bruns v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Harpster v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.