Legal Opinion

Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v. Novelty, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided February 18, 2003No. 1:02-cv-01487Published

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY DEFENSE COUNSEL

BARKER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft and Volkswagen of America, Inc. (hereafter “VW”) 1 have sued Novelty, Inc. for, most pertinently, trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution, and unfair competition, all in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(a) and 1125(a) and (c). The case is before us on a collateral matter: the plaintiffs’ motion to disqualify the firm of Woodard, Emhardt, Naughton, Moriarty & McNett (hereafter ‘Woodard” or the “defense firm”) from its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Analytica, Incorporated v. Npd Research, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Appeals of Schwartz & Freeman and Pressman and Hartunian ChtdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Richey v. ChappellIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Douglas v. MonroeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Maas v. BlochIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API