Abramovic v. Brunken
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVID, J. *
Defendant and cross-complainant Bertha Abramovic appeals from a judgment entered in a partition suit decreeing she has no interest in the property involved, to the exclusion of the remaindermen designated in a testamentary trust. The trust was set up under a will executed by Henry F. Brunken on May. 1, 1940, which as involved here, provides: “Eighth: I hereby give and bequeath to my son, John Brunken, the sum of Two Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($2000.00). If my said son, John Brunken, remains unmarried, I hereby give and devise to my Trustees hereinafter named a one-fourth…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Estate of HeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank v. HuseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Estate of PittmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Estate of O'ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- In Re the Estate of FortneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
- People v. CouchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.