Legal Opinion

Abramovic v. Brunken

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1971No. Civ. 27137PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVID, J. *

Defendant and cross-complainant Bertha Abramovic appeals from a judgment entered in a partition suit decreeing she has no interest in the property involved, to the exclusion of the remaindermen designated in a testamentary trust. The trust was set up under a will executed by Henry F. Brunken on May. 1, 1940, which as involved here, provides: “Eighth: I hereby give and bequeath to my son, John Brunken, the sum of Two Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($2000.00). If my said son, John Brunken, remains unmarried, I hereby give and devise to my Trustees hereinafter named a one-fourth…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Estate of HeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank v. HuseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Estate of PittmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Estate of O'ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. In Re the Estate of FortneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  5. People v. CouchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API