Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 10, 2017No. CV-16-660PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBart F. Virden, Judge

11 This case arises out of a default judgment in the Cleburne County Circuit Court. Patrick Malloy and John Callaghan raise the following three arguments in support of their position that the default judgment should be set aside: (1) Bruce and Jan Smith (the Smiths) did not comply with New York law regarding completion of service; (2) the Smiths’ summonses do not strictly comply with Ark. R. Civ. P. 4(b); and (3) the default judgment against Malloy and Callaghan should be set aside for the reasons stated above and also due to “excusable neglect.” Callaghan further argues that Malloy’s defense…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bossuk v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Trusclair v. McGowan Working PartnersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Israel v. OskeyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Maple Leaf Canvas, Inc. v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Malloy v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API