Legal Opinion

Maple Leaf Canvas, Inc. v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 23, 1992No. 92-469PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

The sole issue in this case is whether the circuit court abused its discretion in entering a default judgment against the appellant, Maple Leaf Canvas, Inc. We hold that it did not, and we affirm the judgment.

The appellees, Michael Rogers and Serena Rogers, reside in Hot Springs in Garland County, and Maple Leaf does business in North Little Rock in Pulaski County. In April 1989, Maple Leaf sold a 175-foot canvas canopy to the appellees. That canopy developed problems and was replaced under warranty a year later by the manufacturer, United Textile. The second canopy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. B & F ENGINEERING, INC. v. CotroneoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Wilburn v. Keenan Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Cammack v. ChalmersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Burns v. MaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. CMS JONESBORD REHABILITATION, INC. v. LambSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McGraw v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Volunteer Transport, Inc. v. HouseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Byrd v. DarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Israel v. OskeyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Layman v. BoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API