Legal Opinion

V-Q

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1960No. 1103PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAritat OF V—Q- In EXCLUSION Proceedings A-10550819 Deeifigd by Board September 16,1980 Admission—Occurs when finding of admissibility has been communicated to alien—Subsequent action under immigration laws must be taken in depor- tation oroceedings. Jurisdiction to examine an alien as an applicant for admission is lost when the inspecting immigration officer communicates his Ending of admissibility to the alien. At that point an "admission" has occurred; the alien cannot be recalled, even immediately following inspection, for questioning within the exclusion process; and his right to remain…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States ex rel. Patton v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. United States Ex Rel. Fink v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. United States ex rel. Georgas v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. United States v. LazarescuDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hing Sum v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Correa v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Correa v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. SANCHEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980
  5. AREGUILLINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API