Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Patton v. Tod

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 10, 1924No. 259PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMayer, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). In view of the finding of the medical board that Pola Patton was an imbecile, she was mandatorily excludable, as will appear infra. On the facts, several unrelated questions have arisen and require consideration.

It is contended that, when the father became a naturalized American citizen, the child, by virtue thereof, also became an American citizen. Counsel for appellant contends that section 2172 of the United States Revised Statutes was not repealed by section 5 of the Act of March 2, 1907, while counsel for the United States urges that it was repealed.

In…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Sullivan v. KiddSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. O'Connor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1860
  4. North Noonday Mining Co. v. Orient Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1880
  5. Campbell v. Gordon and WifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1810

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Nwozuzu v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Travis Damien Ashton v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Southern California Loan Asso. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  5. Lazarescu v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API