Legal Opinion

Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Payne County, Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 13, 1939No. 29221Published

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, V. C. J.

Protestant contends that the excise board appropriated $594 more than was requested and estimated to be needed by tlie governing board of the school district for transfer fees, and that therefore the levy should be reduced .72 of a mill ($663.40) and appropriations should be reduced $594.

Based upon the premises that the excise board appropriated more for transfer fees than was requested by the governing board of the school district, it is urged that the alleged increase is unauthorized, citing Protest of C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 150 Okla. 167, 1 P.2d 383; School Dist. No. 78,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. School Dist. No. 85 v. School Dist. No. 71Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. County Treasurer of Tulsa Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. School District No. 58 v. School District No. 56Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API