Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 2005No. A04-1101PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

In this appeal from conviction of four felonies, Clay Clark challenges the district court’s denial of his requests to substitute appointed counsel, appoint advisory counsel, and rescind self-representation. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion and properly applied the law in denying Clark’s requests, we affirm.

FACTS

Clay Clark fled from police officers in a car that had been reported stolen. After police took him into custody, the Hennepin County Attorney charged him with receiving stolen property, fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle, possession…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. GasslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. State v. WorthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. CamachoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API