Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 2006No. A04-1101Published

1Opinion of the Court

722 N.W.2d 460 (2006)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Clay Carl CLARK, Appellant.

No. A04-1101.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

October 12, 2006.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Steven P. Russett, Assistant State Public Defender, Office of the State Public Defender, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, Amy Klobuchar, Hennepin County Attorney, Donna J. Wolfson, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Following a jury trial in Hennepin County District Court, appellant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. People v. BigelowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API