Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 12, 2006No. A04-1101PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*462OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Following a jury trial in Hennepin County District Court, appellant Clay Carl Clark was convicted of being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle, and theft of a motor vehicle. On appeal to the court of appeals, Clark argued that the trial court erred in denying his requests for substitute counsel, for advisory counsel after he elected to represent himself, and to relinquish self-representation. The court of appeals affirmed. State v. Clark, 698 N.W.2d 173 (Minn.App.2005). Concluding that any error in the trial court’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. BigelowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. MuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Holt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State of Minnesota v. Shavelle Oscar Chavez-NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Dobbins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.