Legal Opinion
El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Gas Company of New Mexico, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 10, 1996No. 94-1789PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Senior Circuit Judge BUCKLEY.
BUCKLEY, Senior Circuit Judge:
This ease arises out of a tariff filing by El Paso Natural Gas Company in which it sought to recover from its customers 75 percent of the value of certain oil and gas bearing properties it had transferred to a gas producer as part of a settlement agreement to resolve a “take-or-pay” contract dispute. Relying solely on a discounted cash flow methodology, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) determined the fair market value of the properties at the time of transfer to be $98.3…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. 320.0 Acres of Land, More or Less in the County of Monroe, State of Florida,and Salvatore R. CicconeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Windward Energy & Marketing Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. 429.59 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Joseph Seravalli, John Seravalli, Jr., and the Brookchester Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fairfield Gardens, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Harlingen v. Estate of SharboneauTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- NextWave Personal Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (In Re NextWave Personal Communications, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- City of Harlingen v. Estate of SharboneauTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Hahnenkamm, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.