Legal Opinion
State v. Pashall
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 16, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
On September 21st, 1932, Ralph Mele was arrested and brought before the criminal side of the Superior Court at New Haven on an information charging him with the crime of robbery while armed. The information and arrest grew out of a transaction known as the Lesnow robbery. On December 24th, 1932, Mele was admitted to bail on that information by virtue of the defendants, Frederick M. Pashall and Philomena Calamita, acknowledging themselves sureties in a recognizance in the sum of $15,000, conditioned that Mele would appear before the Superior Court to be held at New Haven on the second Tuesday…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Taintor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Dombroski v. AbramsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Hartford-Aetna National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Calamita v. DeponteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- State v. SheriffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001