Legal Opinion
State v. Sheriff
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 19, 2011No. SC 18293PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The plaintiff in error, Flavio Bail Bonds, LLC (Flavio), claims that the trial court improperly denied its petition for compromise or release from its obligation on surety bail bonds, which the trial court had ordered forfeited after the principal on the bonds, David Sheriff, the criminal defendant, failed to appear for trial. The defendant in error, Kevin T. Kane, the chief state’s attorney, responds that the trial court properly denied Flavio’s petition for failure to demonstrate good cause for release from its obligation on the bonds, as required by Practice Book § 38-23.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Potvin v. Lincoln Service & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Taintor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. AgronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. GarciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Cragg v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.