Legal Opinion

LaFrentz v. Lockheed Martin Corporation

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 31, 2021No. 4:18-cv-04229Unknown

1Opinion

□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 31, 2024 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION JAMES B LAFRENTZ, et al, § § □ Plaintiffs, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:18-CV-4229 § LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, et § al, § § Defendants. § ORDER Pending before the Court is 3M Company’s (“3M”) and General Dynamics Corporation’s (“General Dynamics”) (collectively the “Defendants”) Motion for Sanctions. (Doc. No. 112). The Plaintiffs have filed a response (Doc. No. 114) and each defendant has filed a reply (Doc. Nos. 115 & 116). In…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  4. Jaime Guzman v. Melvin JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  5. Ashton Ex Rel. Estate of Ashton v. Knight Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API