Legal Opinion

Thyhsen v. Brodsky

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1966Published

1Opinion of the CourtCharles Lambiase, J.

The original action, in the nature of a taxpayers’ action, has been brought by plaintiffs against defendants for judgment: “ (1) enjoining and restraining the Defendants, other than the city op Rochester, and each of them temporarily and permanently from constructing any road over land owned by the City of Rochester and shown in light blue on Exhibit ‘ A ’ hereunto annexed and from installing any hydrants, pavements, pipes, sewers, manholes, sidewalks or other improvements or otherwise trespassing under upon or over the said property; (2) directing that all such installations heretofore made…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tax Lien Co. v. . SchultzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Lord v. . AtkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Matter of City of N.Y. (Northern Blvd.)New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Dunham v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Porter v. . International Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API