Legal Opinion

Irvine v. Angus

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1899No. 438PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern. District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

This was an action at law to recover from the defendants, as executors of the will of James G. Pair, deceased, the sum of $15,1-90.60, paid by plaintiff on account of assessments on certain shares of stock alleged to have been held by him, at the time of such payment, in trust for said Pair. The complaint further alleges that the money paid by plaintiff on account of said assessments was so paid at the special instance and request of Pair, and to his sole use and benefit. It appears that on March 28, 1874, the plaintiff executed an instrument in which he declared that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Homestead Company v. Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Wright v. ButlerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  3. Irvine v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Irvine v. AngusU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. American Exchange Nat. Bank of Dallas v. KeeleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Smith v. MosierU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1909
  4. Peterson v. HowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. C. C. Mengel & Bro. Co. v. Handy Chocolate Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API