Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Howell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 28, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants in error, whom we will hereafter refer to as the plaintiffs, sued the plaintiff in error, whom we will hereafter refer to as the defendant, in an action of assumpsit. The declaration contained the three money counts, namely for money lent, money paid, and money received and also a special count purporting to set up an express contract for the purchase of real estate. To the declaration was attached the following, as Exhibit "A":

"Howell et al. vs. Peterson.

STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT

Paid on Contract Sept. 4th, 1923 $ 500.00 17 monthly payments of $45.00 each from Oct. 1st, 1923, to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. LesleySupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  2. Cox v. GroseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Weiss v. GuerineauIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Locke v. MurdochNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Kirkpatrick v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1874

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Love v. Brown Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Harper v. BronsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Normandy Beach Properties Corp. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Banco Inversion v. Celtic Finance Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Policastro v. MyersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API