Legal Opinion

Fustok v. Conticommodity Services., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 25, 1985No. 82 Civ. 1538 (MEL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LASKER, District Judge.

The defendants move to set aside the determination of Honorable Nina Gershon, Magistrate of this court, requiring production of a report by consulting public accountants prepared at the request of defendants’ counsel. The defendants argue that the report-was prepared in anticipation of litigation within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) and (4) and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated either a particularized need for the discovery of the report or “exceptional circumstances” (Rule 26(b)(4)) justifying its discovery.

Recognizing that under 28…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. United States v. Harry Ronald Frans, United States of America v. James J. Arrajj, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Rexford v. OlczakDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
  3. Calabro v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  4. Snyder v. WinterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1994
  5. Mandarin Oriental, Inc. v. HDI Global Insurance Company and Assicurazioni Generali S.P.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API