Legal Opinion
Margos v. Gonzales
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The action is for personal injuries resulting to the plaintiff, a sidewalk pedestrian, who was struck by a motor vehicle operated by the defendant. Paragraph Fourth of the complaint reads: ‘ ‘ That said defendant failed to stop and identify himself at the scene of the accident, and was thereafter convicted in the Court of Special -Sessions of the City of New York for such act.”
Presumably, the conviction referred to was under section 600 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (formerly Vehicle and Traffic Law of 1929, § 70, subd. 5-a) which provides that any person operating a motor vehicle ‘ ‘ who,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gerseta Corp. v. Silk Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Isaacs v. Washougal Clothing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Neftel v. . LightstoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Nasmie Construction Co. v. QuasmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Wayte v. Bowker Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reitano v. DobbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968