Legal Opinion
Turner Ansley v. Ameriquest Mortgage Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 2003No. 02-55848PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SINGLETON, District Judge.
Ameriquest Mortgage Company (“Am-eriquest”) appeals the district court’s order awarding attorney fees to Turner Ansley, following the court’s order remanding Ans-ley’s action to Orange County Superior Court. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Ansley’s state court complaint alleged that Ameri-quest charged him a mortgage prepayment penalty in an amount exceeding that permitted by California Civil Code § 2954.9 and California Business & Professions Code § 10242.6. Ameriquest removed the action to federal court, arguing that 'the federal Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Susan Kanter Sharon Plunk v. Warner-Lambert Co. And Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Gibson v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Dennis Ex Rel. PICO Holdings, Inc. v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- City of Oakland v. Bp P.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Hafiz v. Greenpoint Mortage Funding, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.