Legal Opinion

Bearden v. Bearden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 12, 1979No. 20882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

This consolidated appeal is from two orders of the family court in two separate actions involving the same parties.

Mrs. Bearden appeals from an order of the family court refusing to use its contempt powers to enforce the alimony provisions of the parties’ property settlement agreement, and refusing to require Dr. Bearden to pay the college expenses for the parties’ older son. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

Dr. Bearden appeals from an order of the family court refusing to rescind the parties’ property settlement agreement on the ground of fraud. We affirm.

Dr. and Mrs.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. YaschikSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. Spires v. HigginsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Means v. MeansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Hicks v. HicksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. Pratt v. PrattCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Acrey v. AcreyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API