Legal Opinion

Smith v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1931No. Appeal, 324PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff appeals from a decree quashing a writ of alternative mandamus seeking to compel the director of the department of public safety of the City of Philadelphia to reinstate appellant in the position of district surgeon, medical division, of that department, from which he was discharged by the director for reasons duly stated.

Appellant contends that, following his appointment and assignment to the bureau of police as a surgeon, with authority to wear a uniform, possess fire and police box keys, make arrests, wear a badge and carry firearms, he was invested with all the powers…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shellenberger v. WarburtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradycamp v. T. W. MetzgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. McNitt v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Ditko Appeal, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1955
  4. Ferguson v. City of PhiladelphiaPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API