Legal Opinion

Saultz v. Funk

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1979No. 38328PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrenzler, P. J.

This case involves the question of the timeliness of the filing of an action for medical malpractice.

On July 27, 1976, the plaintiffs-appellants, Catherine and Ralph P. Saultz, husband and wife, filed a complaint in the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court against the defendant-appellee, Paul 0. Funk, M.D., hereinafter referred to as appellee, arising out of a tubal ligation alleged to have been negligently performed by the appellee upon Mrs. Saultz. In their complaint the appellants stated that Mrs. Saultz entered the hospital on November 14, 1973, and that thereafter the operation was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Laughlin v. ForgraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Wyler v. TripiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Melnyk v. Cleveland ClinicOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Owen v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Shover v. Cordis Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Koppes v. PearsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Lawrence, Dykes, Goodenberger, Bower & ClancyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API