Legal Opinion

Fox Lane Corp. v. Mann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1926PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mandamus order reversed upon the law, without costs, and application for mandamus order denied, without costs. Since the repeal, on October 3, 1924, of former section 24 of the Building Zone Resolution, there is nothing in the zoning ordinance to save existing permits, and, as no work had been commenced, and no building erected or in course of construction, at the time of the amendment, the provisions of the present section 24 of the Building Zone Resolution which prevent the operation of an amendment to existing buildings or premises do not apply, and the expenditures made and obligations…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Publicity Leasing Co. v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Dubow v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. People ex rel. Ortenberg v. BalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API