Legal Opinion
Chua Han Mow v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1984No. 83-1925PublishedCited by 169 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Chua appeals the order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his prison sentence. Chua alleges various procedural errors and constitutional violations in his prosecution for violating United States laws against importation and distribution of controlled substances. We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
On May 16, 1973, Chua Han Mow, a Malaysian citizen, was charged along with six others with violating United States laws against importation and distribution of controlled substances. Chua was in Malaysia at this time. Two of Chua’s codefendants who were in the United States were…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Luchai Ruviwat v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the U.S. And Robert Christensen, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by169 opinions
- Jonah Iaea v. Franklin Sunn, Director of the Department of Social Services, State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Darrell Lee Brown v. Richard H. Rison, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Phillip Martinez v. Rob Roberts, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Javier Vasquez-VelascoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.