Legal Opinion
At & T CORP. v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 5, 2003No. 01 Civ.4872(WHP)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
On June 4, 2001, plaintiff AT & T Corp. (“AT & T”) filed this patent infringement action alleging that certain of defendant Microsoft Corporation’s (“Microsoft”) products containing speech codecs 1 infringe its United States Reissue Patent No. 32,580 (the “580 patent”). 2 Currently before this Court is Microsoft’s motion for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.CivJ?. 56 and 35 U.S.C. § 287(a), to limit AT & T from seeking potential damages in this action accruing prior to April 2, 1999. For the reasons set forth below, Microsoft’s motion for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Maxine GRADY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AFFILIATED CENTRAL, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Merck & Co. v. Mediplan Health Consulting, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011