United States v. Semet

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Defendant Semet has filed a Motion to Vacate or Correct his Sentence of twenty-five years or in the alternative to be granted an evidentiary hearing on the ground that such sentence was illegally imposed, in that he did not understand the charge to which he pleaded guilty. This Motion is the second attempt by Semet to obtain relief from his conviction.1 He proceeds under Rule 35, F.R. Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A. and 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.

As regards Defendant’s Motion under Rule 35, said Motion must be denied as it presupposes a valid conviction of the offense with which…