Sammy Gene Kirk v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KINNEARY, District Judge.
Sammy Gene Kirk appeals from an order of the district court denying his “petition for redress” wherein he sought the convening of a three judge court to consider the constitutionality of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2114. The district court treated the “petition for redress” as a motion to vacate sentence under the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Section 2255. The district court denied petitioner’s request to convene a three judge court for the reason that no substantial federal constitutional question was raised concerning the constitutionality…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Loy Lavator Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Edward Wayne BeverleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Loyce Edward Brooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Donald Ellsworth ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Philip Davis, Louis HazzardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Howard J. Conte v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden Ohio State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Ernest Richard Speed and Dwight Arnold Camp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Howard J. Conte v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden Ohio State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. David PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975