Legal Opinion

Coghlan v. Cuskelly

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1932No. File No. 6071PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

Article 33 of the amendments of the constitution of North Dakota, provides:

“The qualified electors of the state or of any county, or of any congressional, judicial or legislative district may petition for the recall (of) any elective congressional, state, county, judicial or legislative officer by filing a petition with the officer with whom the petition for nomination to such office in the primary election is filed, demanding the recall of such officer. Such petition shall be signed by at least thirty per cent of the qualified electors who voted at the preceding election for the office of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sim v. RosholtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Wood v. BryneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Seibert v. LovellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Schumacher v. ByrneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State ex rel. Laird v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chester v. EinarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Halgren v. Welling, SEC. of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Michigan State Dental Society v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Roberts v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  5. In Re Initiative Petition No. 2Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API