Legal Opinion

Eduardo Hernandez v. Marion Spearman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 22, 2014No. 09-55306PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Eduardo Hernandez’s federal habeas corpus petition was dismissed as untimely after the district court refused to apply the “prison mailbox” rule to calculate the dates of Hernandez’s filings. The district court found the rule inapplicable because a prisoner other than Hernandez delivered the petition to prison authorities for mailing to the clerk of court. We hold that the prison mailbox rule applies to such a circumstance and, accordingly, reverse the dismissal of Hernandez’s petition.

I

Hernandez, a California prisoner, is serving two indeterminate life…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Evans v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Uranga v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. John Uranga, III v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. Wolff v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  4. Torres v. McDowellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  5. Wolff v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API