Legal Opinion
Wolff v. California
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 14, 2017No. Case No. ED CV 15-00244-VBFPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Directing Defendants to Respond to FRCP 60(b) Motion for Relief from Judgment by Friday, March 17, 2017;
Permitting Plaintiff to Reply by Apr. 14, 2017
Valerie Baker Fairbank, Senior United States District Judge
Proceeding pro se, California state prisoner Herbert Wolff (“plaintiff’) initiated this action on February 9, 2015, by filing a complaint for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. See Case Management / Electronic Case Filing System Document (“Doc”) 1, along with a motion for appointment of counsel (Doc 2) and a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (Doc 3). On February…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bankers Mortgage Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Cessna Finance Corporation v. Bielenberg Masonry Contracting, Inc., Paul BielenbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Wolff v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Derik Colin Oliver v. The PeopleDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Derik Colin Oliver v. The PeopleDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Donnell G. Haddock v. LunaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
- Hearn v. WardenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022