Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1984No. 84-11, 84-19 and 84-29PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Appellants Henry Williams, Steven Harrison and Steve Garcia appeal from the denial of their respective motions for sentence reduction pursuant to Rule 36; W.R. Cr.P. 1 We affirm.

The question presented to us, as stated by appellants, is

“Whether a trial court has jurisdiction to reduce a previously-imposed sentence beneath a legislatively-mandated minimum term.”

Appellant Garcia was convicted of second degree murder in violation of § 6-4-104, W.S.1977, 2 and sentenced to a term of not less than twenty years, the statutory minimum, nor more than twenty-seven years in the state…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Sorenson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Enrique Reyes Leyvas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Baum v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Daugherty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API