Legal Opinion
Ralston Purina Company v. Jungers
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1972No. File 10966PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Presiding Judge.
The Ralston Purina Company brought this action to recover $6,311.97 on a promissory note executed by defendants, Francis H. Jungers and Irma Jungers, on January 10, 1967. Plaintiff alleged the promissory note represented the balance due for feed furnished defendants in accordance with a cattle feeding contract. Defendants answered and counterclaimed for damages in the amount of $12,000 because of failure of consideration, false representations, negligence, and breach of warranty. Plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict was denied and the issues submitted to the jury…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ralston Purina Company v. J. S. Edmunds, J. L. Edmunds and J. W. Edmunds, Co-Partners Doing Business as J. S. Edmunds and SonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Western Feed Co. v. HeidloffOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Green v. RALSTON PURNIA COMPANYSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- United States v. George Schaeffer, Jr., and Elsie Schaeffer, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Ives v. Swift & CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hulstein v. Meilman Food Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- First National Bank of Belfield v. BurichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Sorenson v. FeltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Regan v. Moyle Petroleum Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- CHECK CONTROL. INC. v. ShepherdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.