Legal Opinion

Hulstein v. Meilman Food Industries, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1980No. 12790PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, Justice.

In an action in the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit, plaintiff Tony Hul-stein received a jury award of $7,000 actual damages and $50,000 punitive damages. The trial court, in response to a motion by defendant Meilman Food Industries, Inc. (Meilman) for judgment n. o. v. or, alternatively, for a new trial, denied the motion for new trial on the condition that Hulstein file a remittitur accepting reduced damages of $4,574.46 actual damages and $5,000 punitive damages. Hulstein refused to accept the reduction in damages, and the trial court entered its order granting a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alonzo Wayne Taylor v. The Washington Terminal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. Northrup v. Miles Homes, Inc. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Syester v. BantaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  5. Richard S. Simpson v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Stormo v. StrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Don M. Davis, as of the Estate of Ethlyn M. Davis, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. Flockhart v. WyantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. K & E Land and Cattle, Inc. v. MayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API