Legal Opinion

Arenas v. SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 31, 2021No. 2:21-cv-02055Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS FEDERICO ARENAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 21-2055-JAR ) SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Defendant has filed a motion to stay discovery and other pretrial proceedings (ECF No. 9) pending a ruling on its motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff has not filed a response to the motion to stay discovery and pretrial proceedings, and the time for doing so under D. Kan. R. 6.1(d) has run. The motion is granted. D. Kan. Rule 7.4 provides: “If a responsive brief or memorandum is not filed within…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Wolf v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Kutilek v. GannonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API