Legal Opinion
Kutilek v. Gannon
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 24, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 90-1071-CPublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN B. WOOLEY, United States Magistrate.
This matter comes before the court upon the motion of defendants Richard Gannon and Dr. Baraban for a Protective Order (filed May 18, 1990, Dkt. # 14). On May 23, 1990, defendant Dr. William Bruner also filed a Motion for a Protective Order (Dkt. # 17). On June 5, defendants Gannon, Baraban and Bruner filed a “Supplemental Brief in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order” (Dkt. # 23). Attached to Dkt. #23 are Exhibits A, B, C and D, the latter two being directed to the requirement of Rule 210(j) of the Local Rules. The court notes that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wilhelm v. Continental Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Wolf v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- McCormick v. City of LawrenceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Kouba v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Manning v. General MotorsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Commodities Future Trading Commission v. Wall Street Underground, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.