Legal Opinion
Wolf v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 30, 1994No. 93-1406-FGTPublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REID, United States Magistrate Judge.
On March 8, 1994, defendant filed a motion to stay discovery until the court has ruled on defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 10). Defendant did not respond to the motion to stay, but filed their response to the motion to dismiss on March 21, 1994 (Doc. 12).
The general policy in this district is not to stay discovery even though dispositive motions are pending. However, it is appropriate for a court to stay discovery until a pending dispositive motion is decided, especially where the ease is likely to be finally concluded as a result of the ruling…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kutilek v. GannonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
3Cited by114 opinions
- Storts v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nippon Carbide Industries Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Anderson v. Fort Hays State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- Anderson v. Heartland Coca-ColaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Arenas v. SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2021
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.