Legal Opinion
People v. Johnson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1998PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant’s argument that the trial court should have used the “grossly unqualified” standard contained in CPL 270.35 in determining whether the subject juror should be discharged is unpreserved for appellate review, having been raised for the first time in support of defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict (see, People v Laraby, 92 NY2d 932; People v Lawrence, 85 NY2d 1002, 1005). Applying the “for cause” standard of CPL 270.20 (1) (b), which defendant conceded in the pretrial colloquy was the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BrensicNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. BrensicNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. LarabyNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. WhyteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. MaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- CASTRO, JUAN, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.