Legal Opinion
People v. Mailey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 18, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Upon granting defendant’s motion for a writ of error coram nobis and vacating our prior order and decision (People v Mailey, 252 AD2d 995), we now consider defendant’s appeal de novo.
We reject defendant’s contention that Supreme Court erred in failing to hold a competency hearing. The court was not “of the opinion that the defendant may be an incapacitated person” (CPL 730.30 [1]), and “the record fails to reveal the existence of any reasonable grounds to believe that defendant was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LeaboNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. ClaudioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. SimsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. StillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. GarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005