Legal Opinion
United States v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 6, 1965No. Civ. 64-398PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOLOMON, Chief Judge:
Norman Svendsen, a Government employee, was involved in a collision while operating his automobile during the course of his employment. Svendsen was covered under an automobile liability insurance policy issued by defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). As a result of the collision, two actions were brought against the Government by the injured parties under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2674. The Government moved to implead State Farm as third party defendant, but the motion was denied. After judgments of $1,604.20 and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Patterson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1964
- Gipson v. ShelleyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963
- Nistendirk v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964
- Amato v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- United States v. James S. Myers, Individually and for His Wife, Harriet Myers, and as Natural Guardian and Next Friend of James Myers, a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Jack Siegel v. William E. Bookhultz & Sons, Inc., St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Franklin Mem. Hosp. v. Ms. Farm Bureau Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.